A.C. chief replaces Vice Unit officers
By LYNDA COHEN Staff Writer, (609) 272-7257
Published: Sunday, September 25, 2005
Updated: Sunday, September 25, 2005
There will be a new look to the city's Vice Unit beginning
today.
The entire department - including supervisors and all 15
detectives - is being replaced.
While there have been rumblings in the Police Department
over the mass move that began last week, the new Vice Unit
commander is not worried.
"We're all cops, we're all professionals," Capt. Harold
Hutchins said. "Police work is police work is police work."
Hutchins, a 24-year ACPD veteran, said he has done a lot of
vice-related work over the years, although not as a
plain-clothes detective.
Police Chief Arthur Snellbaker would not comment on the
changes.
"It is a personnel move which is internal and not for public
consumption," department spokesman Lt. Michael Tullio said.
"These things do happen from time to time, and it is the
chief's prerogative to do so."
Hutchins did not have information on where each of the
detectives is going, but did confirm that the entire unit
will be replaced.
"They're being dispersed around, reassigned to different
units," he said last week. "Some already took effect. The
majority will take effect Sunday (today)."
The leadership was moved first, with Hutchins taking the
reins from Capt. Joe Fair. All the supervisors and
detectives will be replaced, meaning no cuts to the unit,
Hutchins said.
PBA Local 24 President Curt Williams said he has heard from
a few officers involved.
"They're not complaining, just voicing concerns," Williams
said. "They want to know where they are going, what shift
they'll be on."
He said they also are unclear on the reason behind the
transfers.
"Your assignment is at the discretion of the chief, and they
understand that," Williams said. "Their concern is just,
from that standpoint, they hope the chief doesn't think they
were doing something he didn't like that warranted the
move."
"It is a move that necessarily needs to be shrouded in some
secrecy because of the nature of the work the unit does,"
Tullio said.
Such mass changes are not unusual in big-city police
departments, according to a criminal law professor at Rowan
University.
"Many agencies have this policy, namely that they change
police officers from one unit to the other," said Allan
Jiao, chairman of the Department of Law and Justice Studies
at Rowan University. "It is especially common in large
departments, like New York and Los Angeles."
Jiao said the two reasons behind a rotation policy are
usually to reduce the chance of corruption and expand job
experience.
"It's hard to comment without knowing the background
information on what triggered the move," said Jiao, who is
working with students in tracking guns that come into the
city. "From a professional perspective, generally speaking,
(the transfer) is because they want the vice unit to be more
effective."
Vice work, which depends on gaining information from the
public and having close contact with drugs and money, is
sometimes prone to corruption.
"You need to have a close relationship with the public, but
it has to remain a professional relationship," Jiao said.
"This is a fine balance that has to be checked.
By changing personnel, this risk is lessened, he said.
"I'm not saying that Atlantic City's unit is corrupt," Jiao
stressed. "But, in general, if you keep changing their
shifts, you don't have the chance to develop those personal
relationships."
A more positive reason for these types of rotations is to
have officers gain more knowledge, helping them communicate
with departments outside their own.
"If you only work in one unit, you basically have tunnel
vision," Jiao said. "This increases variety in their job
responsibilities. They become more well-rounded officers so
hopefully they have a department-wide view."
To e-mail Lynda Cohen at The Press:
LCohen@pressofac.com